December 01, 2004

James Cameron on Space

In a recent Wired magazine interview, James Cameron states very eloquently why space exploration and development is so important:

Everybody talks about the cost of going to space. But what about the cost of not going? Where would our economy be if the space race of the '60s had not happened? What if we hadn't been forced to come up with more-powerful computing to calculate trajectories on the fly while guys were on the far side of the moon in titanium cans? Where will we be in 20 years if we don't do something that captures the public imagination and inspires kids to give a damn about science and engineering again? What if we become Rome, blinded by the image of our own superiority while other younger, more vigorous cultures supplant us?

You may be asking: Shouldn't we solve our problems here on Earth before we go into space? There will never be a time when all people are satisfied, when all wrongs are addressed. We live better, more luxuriously, and longer now than at any other time in history. Cook, da Gama, and Magellan left behind shores wracked by death, disease, and social injustice - but they went, and their societies benefited. Our problems must be solved, but not at the expense of exploration.

Exploration is not a luxury. It defines us as a civilization. It directly or indirectly benefits every member of society. It yields an inspirational dividend whose impact on our self-image, confidence, and economic and geopolitical stature is immeasurable.

So, as the ones paying the tax bills, we have to shout out that we want this! Our shout has to be loud enough that in the mind of the politician, that fear-based processing algorithm, the fear of going becomes less than the fear of not going.

What are we waiting for? Let's go.

Posted by Tom Nugent at December 1, 2004 09:17 PM
Comments

Who would have thought that a man who poured out the drivel of "Titanic" could write so eloquently (well....I guess he did also write "The Terminator" and "The Abyss")

Posted by: Tom at December 2, 2004 12:18 PM

Actually, if you read the entire interview, you'll find out that he did "Titanic" as an excuse to go deep-sea diving to the actual ship. :-) So maybe it's understandable that the movie plot had so much drivel - he wasn't thinking about the plot, he was thinking about cool scenery!

Posted by: Tom Nugent at December 2, 2004 12:22 PM

There was no excuse for that film...the only good part was shen she dropped Leo to his watery grave. He's made some bling from his films...he could have paid to visit Titanic without making a bad film.

Posted by: Tom at December 2, 2004 06:08 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?